An•arch•ei noun One with no ruler.
I am an individualist, I accept that the collective does not exist. I am an atheist, I accept that gods cannot logically exist in reality. I am a voluntaryist, I accept the immorality of violent orderless social organisation. I am a vegetarian, I accept that killing animals is not in line with the non—aggression principle. I am also a fairly decent writer, photographer, web designer, and graphic artist. Read More

Non-Voting

anarchyagogo:

Governments, like all other hierarchical institutions, depend upon the cooperation and, at least, the tacit consent of those over whom they exercise power. In other words, government soldiers and police can force people to do things they don’t want to do, but in the long run — in the face of adamant opposition — such coercion is either too expensive or too futile to accomplish its goals of subjugating entire populations. It is far simpler to motivate people to do what you want them to do, rather than forcing them to do it by pointing guns at them all the time. As Boris Yeltsin supposedly said, “You can build a throne with bayonets, but you can’t sit on it long.”

Educating generations of parents and children in government schools and teaching them to be patriotic and support their government in political elections is one of the fundamental ways governments garner public support. Citizens are taught that it is both their right and duty to vote. But all this is done with an ulterior motive in mind. As Theodore Lowi, in his book Incomplete Conquest: Governing America pointed out:

Participation is an instrument of [government] conquest because it encourages people to give their consent to being governed . . . Deeply embedded in people’s sense of fair play is the principle that those who play the game must accept the outcome. Those who participate in politics are similarly committed, even if they are consistently on the losing side. Why do politicians plead with everyone to get out and vote? Because voting is the simplest and easiest form of participation [of supporting the state] by masses of people. Even though it is minimal participation, it is sufficient to commit all voters to being governed, regardless of who wins.

There are ways of opposing the state, other than by voting “against” the incumbents. (And remember, even if the opposition politicians are the lesser of two evils, they are still evil.) Such non-political methods as civil disobedience, non-violent resistance, home schooling, bettering one’s self, and improving one’s own understanding of voluntaryism all go far in robbing the government of its much sought after legitimacy.

As Thoreau pointed out, “All voting is a sort of gaming, like chequers or backgammon . . . Even voting for the right is doing nothing for it.” So whatever you do, don’t play the government’s game. Don’t vote. Do something for the right.  

Notes

  1. chicanapower reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  2. thecriticlaughs reblogged this from anarchei
  3. uyyuu reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  4. afreesong reblogged this from aghoulistmike
  5. teadeoska reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  6. web-design-australia reblogged this from anarchei
  7. starmichael reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  8. bmrgould reblogged this from anarchei
  9. anarchei reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  10. aghoulistmike reblogged this from haereticum
  11. haereticum reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  12. dd163 said: Your non-voting post is brilliant
  13. ernestsewell reblogged this from disobey
  14. extranarosa reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  15. ikillpeople reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  16. thepragmaticnihilist reblogged this from anarchyagogo
  17. anarchyagogo posted this